Monday, June 13, 2011

Growth Rings


So, so much has happened.
Human beings, at least emotionally, spiritually, and metaphysically, don't grow like trees at all. The process is not slow, a yearly gain of age, season & reason. We grow like, well, ourselves: small, incoherent & awkward at intervals, then, when intermittently the universe allows it & makes its lessons known, throw us into the great pool of life all at once, find our voices & feet under us. It's a wonder there aren't more drownings, metaphorically speaking, yet somehow there are not.
We go on growing like the calves of antelope, tottering to our feet as quickly as we can. Perhaps we can run fleetly before we know how to nurse. Over & over, we flee, chew greenery we can't digest. We are skilled at crouching down so our spots blend with the shrubs. We teeth. We bolt.
I'd started, recently to feel as though I were trapped, too young to fend for myself somehow, too gawky & inexperienced to make progress-at least, that's how I felt I was acting. And now, things around me are propelling me forward. I'm shooting up again, gaining inches & perspective & chance.
Here it goes again, then, for me!
I've just been thrown headfirst & only marginally refraining from kicking & screaming into the most providential, humbling work of my life.
1,800 greater Seattle area volunteers. 45 local schools. 25 active habitat restoration sites. Our director has a 3-year plan to triple these numbers & to triple our organization's range, staff, donations & impact. 3 major watersheds: the Stillaguamish, Snohomish & Island County jurisdictions.
We are bringing wild salmon back to each. Teaching kids about the importance of watershed restoration. Raising money for tree-plantings, stream remeanders, & pollution reduction.
On the periphery-no, that's not true; very much at the forefront, also-I've managed to swallow my pride long enough & well enough to retain a very, very important relationship. How strident I've been. How loud, hyperbolic, desperate, melodramatic. Yet rather than wonder why he bothers to but up with it, I've decided that I know: never once have I purported to be anything but who & what I am.
It's taken some time, frustration & many false starts, but I've decided to deal with this relationship, as I do all others, from a place of deep love & respect, & so over the next few months, will relay all this to him via email (since the written word is, of course, my stronger suit...).
After weeks of churning wheels, anger, heightened negativity, now this-a breakthrough? A new start? A clean slate? One hopes.
Above all & ever, I hope.
Because, really, it's the other stuff that confounds us, isn't it? The times we feel stymied, ineffectual or lost. We all know what's underneath it, where we began, why. It's only the detritus of everyday life that buries it, when we're wearied by unanswered questions, by bad news, foul weather, lack of time.
It really is such an easy thing, once that's all stripped away, & we find ourselves refocused on who we are, why we are, what we're here to do. Life nourishes us when we're not expecting it, not looking, & then we realise that in paring down to that one essential, we've managed to grow.
Growth through minimalism. Through continuing to breathe, even underwater, as it were.
What an easy, natural thing it can be: to love. Such a simple, simple thing.

Monday, May 2, 2011

To All My Dear Friends, Family, And Loved Ones Otherwise:

May 2, 2011

Dear Loved Ones,

As most of you well know. I have spent the last year volunteering for the national organization AmeriCorps. This has meant my participation in a wide range of projects and activities. I’ve learned many valuable skills in fields that I might never had had time to explore otherwise, including conservation and ecology, volunteer recruitment and coordination, literacy outreach, invasive species removal, habitat restoration, and education.

Having learned so much, in the company of many other driven, accomplished and compassionate people, I feel that it is time to take my knowledge and use it to its best effect elsewhere. “Where is ‘elsewhere’?,” you may ask.

After researching for weeks, an organization called the Sudanese Volunteer Programme came to my attention. SVP is based in London, UK and serves mainly universities and schools in Khartoum, Northern Sudan. Their mission is,

“…the exchange of cultures and the forging of life-long links is our main objective. Improving the standard of English amongst Sudanese is but a useful and welcome by-product of our endeavours!”

Volunteers are housed at their affiliate universities, but can spend time in the homes of their students and colleagues, who live outside Khartoum in Sudanese villages. There is also an Arabic language exchange between volunteers and villagers; being fascinated by languages, I would love the opportunity to learn Arabic. SVP provides a stipend equivalent to a local teacher’s salary. This is not much by American standards, consisting of $130 Sudanese dinars, but it is enough to purchase food, clothing, etc. during the stay. According to SVP’s staff and former volunteers,

“The people are genuinely lovely in Sudan and welcome you into their homes with a generosity that is embarrassing. We seem to have lost this generosity in the West where we tend to be suspicious of the ‘foreigner’. In Sudan, it’s what makes the whole experience worthwhile.” (from SVP’s volunteer blog)

It sounds like we will be well taken care of and welcomed as members of our Sudanese communities. SVP employs volunteer teachers for a minimum of 6 months. At the moment, as discussed with SVP’s director, David Wolton, I would like to depart for Khartoum in October of 2012. This gives me just over a year to prepare.

While there is no cost to the volunteer (save for recreation) while in the Sudan, if I am to make this journey, I will need to raise money for airfare. Currently, tickets from Seattle to Khartoum, where I will be met by SVP staff and taken to my university, cost around $1500. There are very few secure ATMs in the Sudan, nor can American credit cards be used there, so I will also be saving money for exchanging on arrival in Khartoum-this will help purchase appropriate clothing in the local style, toiletries and food until SVP’s stipend kicks in. SVP helps its teachers store & safeguard personal items, paperwork and valuables while in Sudan.

I’m sure the question of security and safety is foremost in your minds. Let me assure you that Khartoum and the Northern Sudan are a far cry from the Darfur Region. SVP provides traveler’s insurance for all of its staff, and the people of the Sudan are, as mentioned, friendly, helpful and peaceful. One of the goals of this project is to foster cultural awareness between the West and the people of Northern Sudan; it is very important that the global community understand the situational differences between the regions. I hope to contribute by lending my skills and an open ear to the people of Sudan, then by passing what I’ve learned there on to my friends, family, peers and community here in the U.S.

So, why am I writing to you?

In order to ensure that I reach my fundraising goals, I’ve decided to reach out to my loved ones for donations. I feel that working with SVP for 6 months will help me immensely in the future: jobs in teaching English as a second language, overseas, and in community services and activism will become easier to obtain. I will have precious knowledge of cultural practices, customs, and the Arabic language. Most of all I will have been able to contribute to the global community in a meaningful way.

If you are able and would like to help me get to the Sudan, please let me know. I will be writing/emailing with updates as often as I can. Regardless, you all have my appreciation for your unending support. Thanks for being with me while I prepare for another adventure!

With Love,

Michele

Monday, March 7, 2011

Halfway Markers


So, here we are, a little over halfway through the year. The weather is gradually improving, as the sun peeks out more frequently & things seems marginally drier. By rights, it seems our spirits should also be lifting, but that's not always the case...

We've been asked to evaluate our host sites, their adherence to AmeriCorps visions, goals & members' specific skill sets & needs; some of our compatriots, whose contracts differ from our own, will be leaving very, very soon. Too soon. We're all at a crossroads, these days, trying to decide if we're "happy" or not, to remind ourselves how many synonyms that word has, how broad a concept it really is. Perhaps, we wonder, we're not fulfilling our own visions here: what difference are we making? How integral is our own happiness to the overall success of our site in its entirety, be it middle school, tribal center, marine science center, community action patrol?

The cracks are starting to show. Some days it feels as though we're just covering over the bad bits, time after time, exchanging each small hurt for an equal-sized scraping of plaster: a good day with a single student, a great dinner, a hug from a friend.

I don't think I can accurately answer this question-the one of purpose, of meaningful- and impactful-ness. The one about "what we're doing here" & "why" & whether or not our work will stand & remain when we're gone. We all want longevity. We all want to know that in the end, we've "made a difference". It's hard for us to measure that difference against the feeling we have in our bones at the end of some days: that today was a wash, a throw-away. That tomorrow the issues will still be there, the checklist still on the desk, the kid still unable to multiply. That above all, we've missed the mark somehow, but that it's not our fault to accept; that the fault lies with the site. Lost in translation.

Last Saturday we finally managed to go out to our ivy removal site & get some work done. The day started out gray but meandered into sunny & perfect, tide out & bay silver with sunshowers. The eagles were around. New folks joined us to pull ivy & learn about invasive species, including my best friend from Alaska, down for a long weekend & a much-anticipated visit. We played music out the back of someone's Subaru. At the end of the day, each of us could step back from our chosen patch of weeds & see bare ground, ready to be replanted with a native plant someday. It was change you could see. That we'd all felt, in the chill dirt & rain on our faces, the sun on our backs & each other's laughter in our ears.

Later, we went out for a late lunch at the local pub with my best friend & several others who'd participated. We talked out some of our frustrations, with work, with the erstwhile intangibility of our objectives. The fireplace was roaring. My partner leaned over to kiss my forehead. Someone pulled out a word game & for a while, we all got lost in ridiculing the origins of English idioms & slang terms.

Ultimately, we were present. This is what we've done, & what we've been called to do. What we will leave: a presence, the knowledge that our communities will hold onto: that help is available, & that compassion & willingness to contribute are alive & well. Although it's difficult at times, for better or for worse, we're here. And the needs we're meant to serve are, too.

Look around. The bits of plaster & Bandaids that will carry us through are everywhere: in one day's hard work, in friends, in the weather & in yourself. You're present in both the hurts & the unfathomable happiness, & someone somewhere is always grateful.


Monday, January 24, 2011

Sometimes I'm convinced I'll never wrap my head around this shit...

I do not have a handle on touch, nor on my own somewhat convoluted conceptions of what tactility means in relation to other human beings: what, in actuality, does it mean to have physical contact with someone, and in which ways is it most beneficial? In which contexts are we most prone to interpret touch, to seek it out, or to repel it? Perhaps I'm too apt to equate touch, sensation & its nuance with feeling, where feeling, in general, should be taken to mean 'emotion', and emotion in relation to specificity of relation.

My current partner is polyamorous, which is to say that he believes that he is capable (and probably truly is) of having strong feelings (even of loving), and good relationships with more than one person at a time; that dating and caring for multiple others provides a myriad of needs & wants from each of them is perfectly natural, organic & necessary to his emotional well-being.

I, of course, was raised Catholic-not that that has any true bearing on my relationship values whatsoever-in a household where monogamy & the trust, loyalty & 'true' love that supposedly go with it are paramount. It has never been disputed that monogamy is the only way to love, or to share a life; that monogamy is the only way in which touch should occur, that two people should physically express themselves. These things are simply understood, & have colored the way I've thought about how to love, & whom, & when, for a very, very long time.

And herein lies a new dilemma: via the conduit of one's tactile sensitivity, the ways in which it meshes with one's perspective & perception, how does one include more than one total-body stimulus, as it were?

I adore my partner. He's loud, brash, a little crazy; he smells of dirt & green willow & lavender & boy; his mouth tastes like glacier water & anise. But we are not 'together'. We may work together. We may finish each other's sentences, or speak simultaneously, or like the same books, music, movies, and foods. But we are not a unit in that conventional, constrictive way. These cliches that sound to others like romantic paradise are only indicators of this relationship's execution, not its backbone. Not its joints or ribs-its function; not its heart.

I love touching this man, love the absolute sensation of being around him. We're similar enough to make sense to one another (not wholly of course-that would be boring); we're different enough, I hope, to remain exciting. And yet today I found myself getting ready to take a walk on the beach with someone else; some other man. Someone else whose smells & tastes & textures are, while not anathema, certainly perpendicular to my partner's; we walked for an hour. We talked about things I don't talk about with my partner: SCUBA diving, business ventures, the merits of small towns. The pull was not an electric one. This man tastes of cider & salt & citrus. This man does not know about my partner.

I cannot choose. Which is to say, I cannot choose which half of myself to listen to: the one that is governed by a need for interesting, surprising & varied sensation, or the one that loves nothing more than to search for the subtleties of a constant pressure: one partner, or more than one? One source of touch & tactile satisfaction, or the other? Does there have to BE an other?

And these are the questions that lead to the bigger ones: about the feel of singularity, about what it means to 'date' and to be in relationships. About how those lead to consistency, in feeling, in the faces & bodies we see & touch, about what we hear & taste & smell from choice, from a strange chemical compatibility perhaps. About how those in turn lead to comfort, which leads to habit, which leads to permanence.

About how I wonder as I struggle with the words "right", & "love" & "choice" if what I've really been doing is running, & why, & what from...




Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Epic Post-Holiday Update: or, Sorry I Haven't Written, I've Been Busy Livin'



It's been a very, very busy last 3 months for me here in Port Townsend, WA, where I'm working as a volunteer with AmeriCorps. The weather isn't so hot right now: rainy, windy and generally overcast, but that's the way it goes here on the Pen. I'm starting to miss snow a little, but the slightly-warmer temperatures aren't so bad.

I generally work 6 days a week, if not 7, since I'm always working on something. My primary site (the place I spend the most time, and the job I was hired to do) is Blue Heron School. It's a big school with a lot of new kids and procedures, as it has just integrated grades 4-6 with grades 7 and 8, making it a combination elementary-middle school. There's also an alternative, Montessori-like classroom called OPEPO (OPEPO being an acronym whose actual meaning escapes not just me, but basically every other teacher that works at Blue Heron...), where kids from 1st to 5th grade are commingled and then taught according to their current, subject-specific proficiencies. It makes for a mish-mash, and a rather hectic atmosphere most days. There are 3 other AmeriCorps volunteers also placed at Blue Heron, but we each keep very busy, as we all have target kids with special needs to attend to throughout the day, and also run morning and after-school Homework Club. My target kids run the gamut. Some are just in need of someone to help keep them on track and focused. Others have learning disabilities in one subject or another. A couple are in danger of being lost to their emotional, behavioral or other problems: autism, divorced parents, drug and alcohol-related disabilities.

Some days are about as perfect as a day in a public school can get: they've all done their homework AND turned it in (these two things can be mutually exclusive, mind you); there are no fire drills-planned or otherwise, detentions, trips to the nurse or the principal, everyone has a lunch, and everyone listens well and is respectful all day long. Some days, I'm not sure how we're making it, the kids more than myself: over the weekend, one of the kids has bounced between mom's house, grandma's place, and biological dad's before showing up at school on Monday; someone else forgets (either truly or selectively) to take midday meds; no one's work is done, nor turned in; so far we're up to 1 sprained wrist, 1 broken thumb, 2 fights on the playground and 3 trips to the office.

It can be discouraging. You wonder how some of these kids are able to get out of bed every day and make it to school, let alone get any work done. On weekends, I've picked up some work doing invasive species removal and remediation. For anyone who's confused, this consists of seeking out specific habitat areas that have been damaged by the spread of species not originally found in that area. The immediate effect is that the invasives choke out and eventually kill all the native plants in a given radius. The long-term is that the death of the native plants (and/or animals) results in subsequent damage to the ecosystem as a whole; in our case, salmon migration paths and spawning areas are damaged by soil runoff and worse pollution, as certain invasives are causing our streambed to erode more quickly and it's affecting the salmon habitat. So, every Saturday and sometimes Sunday, we're taking teams out to a site about 30 minutes outside town to, ultimately, clear and restore a 2-acre square habitat. It's long and dirty work, since we usually spend at least 4 hours at a time outdoors, digging, pulling, bagging and stacking English Ivy. Often we have groups of teenagers out with us: members of the local Youth Corps young adult volunteers, or "smart kids who did something stupid", aka, Jefferson County Corrections juvenile offenders. It's hard to tell if we're getting through to them. It's hard to tell if they care about the work they're doing.

Then again, you must wonder how this can possibly be the right place for me; it all sounds like pretty hard work for little reward...

My kids are fantastic kids. At least three times a day, I'm taken completely off guard by an excited kid barreling down the hall and hugging me. I have a group I call the "Motley Crew": a somewhat ragtag little band of 4th grade boys, who, for some reason, seem to think I'm pretty cool. I've taken to having lunch with them at least one day a week in the cafeteria. It must be a treat for them because, one day, I let Mack (an inquisitive little guy with an upturned nose, messy brown hair and terrible ADHD) pick the table. As I noticed we were missing a troop, another one of the Motley Crew, Isaiah F, came barreling up with his tray full of pizza and apple slices. He plopped his tray down, looking relieved, and said, "Man, you gotta tell me where we're sitting! I don't wanna miss out!"

Ivy Pull weekends are just as rewarding. We've cleared nearly an acre since the project started, and our work with the juvenile corrections kids (mainly high school aged boys) seems to really be getting through. One of them, who's about 15, is allowed to ride his bike to the site, as he lives just up the street. After the first pull we did with their group, he was all excited to be able to identify certain species of plant, teach his mom about them, and start working to remove invasives from his own back yard. He also sent us a lovely thank you email, including the information that he was, "really excited about the (lunar) eclipse" because as he "considers himself a man of science, he thinks it's really cool."

And, before Christmas break, another of the Motley Crew-Brandon, whose home life is not the greatest, yet is still the sweetest kid-spent all morning searching for me so he could give me a Christmas card, which read, "Dear Michele, I hope you have a very fun and good Christmas. Thank you for helping me at school, Your Friend, Brandon. Ps-I need help in Ms. Manning's class."

This, of course, is why I'm here-why the whole team is here, really: there's still work to do. I plan on being in Port Townsend for at least another year-the duration of time I would have been overseas had the Peace Corps worked out for me. There are good people here, and lots to do. Hopefully the instructor for the local kayak-building class will be back from vacation soon-rumor has it that this spring we are graduating to canoes and/or a 10-ft. dory. I'm learning a new trade, and the classes are free, so I can't really say no!

I've also obtained a new 4-legged companion. His name is Puck and he is a rescue dog, found on one of the reservations on the West End. As the lady who found him could not keep him, and I was headed that direction to participate in a service project (fundraising for the local Quileute Tribal School), I picked him up and he is currently sleeping on the floor with his sock rabbit toy. He's about 2 years old, half Newfoundland-half Chow, and a very good dog. However, he really hates the bathtub, and chews his rawhide bone on the bed.







Starting in March, I'll be teaching a beginning boxing class at the local YMCA. I'll also be getting paid for it. This will be a great chance to get back into boxing and to make some extra money, which I'm hoping to use for travel to South America with a friend in the month between one AmeriCorps contract and the next. I'm not very good at staying in one place, I suppose

There's some local travel in the future, as well. I'm heading to Vancouver, B.C. for a weekend shortly, then to Glacier National Park in Montana for spring break. Hoping to get some good hiking and backpacking in, and as the weather starts to warm, more and more kayaking. This area is beautiful and surrounded by national parks land, beaches and places of interest besides.

Well, I suppose that's about it, as I now have to get back to typing and sending work-related emails. I hope this finds everyone well.

Love to all...if you're reading, and even if you're not...




Thursday, December 9, 2010

Learning to Swim

I wrote this a while back during my master's thesis studies & have been slowly revising it ever since. It's the holidays, which by nature engender a compulsion in me to reflect on faith, my family, and blessing. This essay is just such a reflection. Note: My family's names have been changed, since I'm still too much a chickenshit to use their real ones...


Learning to Swim

“Love is not a victory march/It’s a cold and it’s a broken/Hallelujah”

– Rufus Wainwright

Somewhere, buried in an old photo album, is a photograph my father likes to bring up in family conversations. Apparently it was all the rage in 1983 to bring your infant to the local pool and, quite simply, fling them in. My father says it was a program called Aquababies, designed to familiarize children with water before they were old enough to fear it. In the photo, I’m dog paddling just below the surface of the unnaturally blue water, clad in a frilly navy kiddy suit. As was a strange habit that has lasted into my twenties, my eyes are wide open regardless of the chlorine stinging them. I like to see where I’m going. I imagine my mother taking the photo while standing off to the side, camera trained on me, bubbles streaming from my nose as I paddle toward the arms and hands stretching over from the far right side of the frame—my father’s arms. My father compares this photo to one he’s taken of me in full scuba gear, eyes wide open under the goggles. He says I’ve always sort of looked like a bug, under water. I don’t remember Aquababies at all. I do know that I swim quite well.

In recalling old photographs and bringing them up, at dinner, family barbeques or when a relative comes to visit, my father reminds me that, no matter what, I am still his little girl. He doesn’t say it outright; he’s a quiet man, one who is awkward (although not visibly) around crying women—my mother, for example. When we talk on the phone now, although I am an adult of twenty-five and can talk about ‘adult things’, he would rather discuss the state of the laptop he bought me for graduating with my BA. It is not that he doesn’t converse; he does, but he sometimes ends up sounding like an instructional video for bow hunting or Macintosh computers or Republican politics. (These, of course, are three things close to his heart.) We yell at each other from time to time, over who’s right about inconsequential things: how long it really takes to grill a salmon fillet, which happened first in a series of events, what to listen to on the radio in the car (my pick: music; his: Michael Savage on talk radio). Yet my father’s smile widens in his handsome face when he talks about those old photographs, and underneath what could be inconsequential words is that unspoken message: You are my child and I love you. This is what I hear when I hear my father, telling my aunt about the swimming pool picture, “She still looks like that sometimes.”

*

I cannot tell you what I don’t remember, and so I cannot tell you what it feels like to fly, to exist as nothing but a dark object in motion against a black sky. I cannot tell you the color of the truck that slammed into the Ford Bronco I was riding in, and I cannot tell you how long it was before I regained consciousness. What I can tell you is this: it was cold. When the paramedics arrived, they cut off my new sweatshirt, a fifty-dollar waterproof one; my mother had purchased it for me earlier that day. I touched the chilled and dripping gash in my forehead; it felt like a half-frozen steak. What I looked like immediately following that terrible car accident is not something I can tell you either; I had no mirror. Until the ambulance arrived, I lay sprawled on the side of the road, covered in someone’s jacket. The two friends I’d been in the Bronco with appeared overhead, their faces pushed in around me. If I looked like a bug at all, it was of the variety you might find mashed on your windshield. Apart from my two friends, Tim and Sarah, who’d wanted to go bowling that night despite the icy roads, I didn’t know anyone else who was present. I can tell you that my right arm felt detached from my body, and that after reaching up to touch the bloody left side of my face, I didn’t have enough energy to move again. I briefly saw the face of the kid who had t-boned us hovering above me; inexplicably, I seem to recall noting that he was good-looking. For the duration of the ride to the ER, the tight, restrictive C-collar around my neck had me in a state of panic. I worried little about who was going to break the news to my parents. Everyone had cell phones, I figured. I wouldn’t be lost in the ER, on a gurney somewhere all by myself. Someone would come for me.

*

I believe it must be a supreme act of faith—in what, I’m not quite certain—to do what my parents did at the swimming pool. To pick your child up, to bless them or pray over them or think nothing at all, and then to fling them forth into what might harm. Some people might call it the ultimate aberrant act—chucking your baby into a swimming pool on purpose. It is one thing, I think, to let go of your child, to offer him over to an unknown deliberately, all the while standing by, controlling the variable that is yourself—your fear, your parental instinct, the impulse to dive in after. It is one thing to willingly fling your child into the water. It is another when the world does it for you. No one but she herself will ever know what it is my mother was thinking when she received the phone call telling her that very thing: that one of her children had been flung headlong into the water without her consent, without arms outstretched to catch her.

For a woman who chose to marry an avid hunter and fisherman, who has spent much of that married life cleaning, gutting, quartering and grinding moose, or scaling and beheading dozens of fish at a time, my mother occasionally displays a desperate panic when faced with blood. I suppose, given that this is when one of the six of us injures ourselves, her fear of blood is not of the blood itself, but of what’s happened to the bleeder. She has dealt admirably with split lips and eyebrows, with one brother’s chin gashed all the way across (Gabe tripped and fell on the metal lip of the shower; we got at least a few lollipops each out of that one), with the screwdriver lodged in another brother’s palm (Levi claims he was fixing the trucks on his skateboard; none of the rest of us even knew what a skateboard truck was.) She, fairly calmly, has even handled my little sister belting Gabe in the face with a rock. I suppose the deciding factor in her level of calm the night of the accident was what she later told me the doctor had said:

If she had been in any worse shape, or if she’d been any older, she would have been dead.

The only thing I remember hearing the doctor say was that it would be no problem to stitch up my eyebrow, right there in the ER. All he needed, he averred, was some local anaesthetic and a suture kit. He did just what he’d said, my mother standing somewhere else, refusing to watch as the needle slid in and out of my skin. My mother remembers but that single statement, the one that brought that latent motherly terror to life. She masked her fear from her children, usually, accustomed to running through her ‘crying child’ checklist before pulling out the first aid kit or calling my father to come take a look:

Are you bleeding?

Is anything broken?

Are you dying?

Is anything on fire?

Then you’re fine.

I was not fine. And so my mother was not fine, every maternal fear there is solidified into one. Although I was well aware that she disliked the sight of blood, and especially of her children bleeding, her reaction surprised me. Sometimes the strangest reactions are those of the person who hasn’t been hurt, who’s visiting you in the hospital, just someone bringing flowers or a paperback novel. I had assumed my mother, being my mother, would do something, well…motherly. Touch my hand, perhaps, or stroke back my hair. Instead, and this I saw from the usual hospital-bed angle, which is to say hovering over my face slightly to the left; she leaned down a little, frowned hugely at my newly-stitched forehead, and said, I’m going to go call your father.

*

I do remember a ragged series of vignettes that is most of my family arriving in the ER. First, my sister. She wouldn’t come near me. I was not given the opportunity to see her face hovering above mine as I had my mother’s, but, in a disorienting fashion, I could hear her. I guessed she was standing at the foot of the gurney, but I couldn’t tell. Since they hadn’t cleaned the blood from the left side of my face, I was afforded vision only from my right eye, and only straight up above me. My ears, however, were perfectly fine, and they told me my sister’s reaction quite clearly. She was sobbing over there somewhere: Oh my god. She’s all broken…

A number of minutes later, Gabe, the eldest of my younger brothers (there are four). In his usual manner, he stuffed his hands in his pockets (I heard him do this, as he stood close to my head) and nodded down at me. His slightly gruff and awkward manner reminds me very much of my father; neither of them is good at talking about ‘feelings’; when Gabe and I see each other off at the airport after a visit, it’s a quick one-armed hug, a pat on the back. We don’t really say ‘I love you’. Gabe’s reaction didn’t surprise me when at last he said something: Huh. You look like shit.

Too young to drive themselves over, and exactly young enough to potentially get in the way, the youngest three brothers—Steven, Levi, and David—were still at home. It was just as well, I suppose, since after Gabe arrived, I was moved around, wheeled off down a hallway for x-rays and MRIs, the buzzy-bright hospital lighting hurting my eyes. The x-ray room is the last thing I remember; I must have fallen asleep for the first time shortly thereafter, and would spend most of my six-day hospital stay doing nothing but sleeping. Here is something I do not remember: my father’s arrival to the ER.

*

On one of those six days, having woken up for a little while, like a free diver simply coming back up for air before heading back underwater, I was greeted by all three of my youngest brothers and one of my cousins. Grandma Ann—my father’s mother—was up in Alaska visiting, and she accompanied them. My three youngest brothers—Steven, Levi and David—and cousin Alison had pooled their money to buy me a gift: a new sweatshirt to replace the one cut from my body. Grandma Ann had brought one too, later, Gabe brought me a present of his own; yet another hooded sweatshirt, this one black with red lettering. When something is lost, my family is the kind who replaces it: stuffed toys, shirts or hats that remind us of favorites stained or shredded, especially if one of us has been sick, when we’ve been afraid for one another. Once, when I was a toddler, having my fingers pricked for blood tests, Gabe appeared at the doctor’s office with a stuffed Rainbow Brite dog—this is one of my first memories, in fact. But for our ability to give gifts to one another, we are unable to express what we really mean: that we have been sleepless, worried, and in despair; that when someone we care for may be taken from us, or is hurt, we fill the spaces made by our fear with things—my mother bakes bread or cookies for sick neighbors; we buy novels and books of crosswords when someone is in the hospital; my aunts proffer bottles of wine and movies for a break-up. The fears of my brothers, my cousin, my sister, my grandmother—these are spaces filled with fleece and pull-strings, with the sweatshirts they brought me because they feared that I would be lost.

My father was there from time to time, I’m sure. I heard his voice as I came out of long naps several times, radiating out from his position at the foot or by the side of my bed. The quietude, the air of organization and knowledge that have comforted me always, were there without question. While I can’t recall him ever touching me, or adjusting my pillow, or bringing me drinks of water, I liken the atmosphere created by his presence to a specific memory from childhood. I was probably seven, maybe eight years old, very sick with a fever that caused me to have bizarre nightmares. In these nightmares, I was surrounded by nothing but undulating, pulsing black and white shapes, and a high-pitched continuous whine rang in my ears. For whatever reason, these nightmares forced me into a state of panic on that particular night. I was exactly lucid enough to remember where my parents’ room was: out my bedroom door, take a right, take another right before the kids’ bathroom door, down the hall, through the living room, into what we called the ‘new addition’. My parents slept on a bed that folded down from the wall, big and comfortably. My father had built it himself. Even in my terribly ill state, the one thing I can recall is this: I knew my father would be in that room sleeping. I needed to get to my father. As soon as I crawled into the big, foldout bed with my father, I fell asleep. I know this because I remember my mother—who had been out at my aunt and uncles’, I believe—coming home, which woke me up; she asked my father why I was there. He replied with something, picked me up, and carried me back to my own bed. This did not frighten me over again. I knew my father was there. This was not true of the ER. I fill my father in: present, as he is in the pictures from the swimming pool, yet periphery, there because he must have been, because otherwise, whose arms were those, stretching out toward me?

*

My mother is the one who nurses us when we are sick. She is the one who, faced with a child so sick they refused to eat, would park one of us at the dining room counter and ask if we wanted some ice cream for breakfast. She once camped out on our living room floor with a stomach-achey, crying me and called it ‘our picnic’; never mind that the picnic consisted solely of flat 7-Up. My father is the man who taught us to shoot bows and arrows in the backyard, who once forced a trout hook back out of my chin after I’d been hooked by Gabe’s botched casting. As I spent the few weeks following my discharge from the hospital back on the couch in my parents’ house, my parents, together—Mom with her offerings of cold juice, Dad rising early in the morning to check on me—pervaded my senses, dulled as they were by too much sleep and pain medication. More healing than the medication and the bandages, this sense of being back at home, surrounded by my mother—care and concern, ice cream for my sickness—and my father—the arms outstretched from the corner of the photograph. Once again I was learning to swim. I couldn’t bathe myself without someone helping me drag my useless right arm out of its shirtsleeve. Everything I did, I did left-handed, shuffling around the house in a pair of my father’s old sweatpants and one of my new sweatshirts Once, at dinner a few days after being discharged, I was praised for slowly eating almost all of a baked potato. My parents were a team through all of this, doling out pills, giving pillows, checking back with the hospital about bills and aftercare and checkups. Another way to fill the space: You are living. We will put your life back in order. Gradually things returned to their normal movement. Although I can’t remember doing much but sleeping and watching TV for some weeks, these boring sequences—sleep, bathe clumsily, eat, take pills, watch T.V.—are nevertheless memories. It wasn’t until over a month afterwards that I would learn how my father’s memory of the accident, layered over the accident itself, consisted of what sounded at first like nothing but a song.

I was sitting at the kitchen table one evening listening to music. My father was nearby—perhaps making dinner or doing the dishes. My mother was in their bedroom, probably sitting on the fold-down bed, doodling plans for a new dream house or taking a nap. My brothers and sister were all off on their own, watching TV or at friends’ houses, or outside playing basketball in the driveway. The ways in which we’d lived with each other, eaten, played, slept—all these small routines filled the house with the white noise of family, a white noise that I was drawn out of by the melody of a Rufus Wainwright song:

I heard there was a secret chord

that David played and it pleased the Lord.

But you don’t really care for music, do you?

It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth.

The minor fall, the major lift,

the baffled king composing

Hallelujah.

Hallelujah.

It’s a beautiful song, touching in its simplicity, just a guy and his piano and a simple chord progression. It was on a movie once, “Shrek” I think it was. My father, who will only listen to songs like this—just guys and their guitars or pianos, simple, like those he remembers from his own childhood—looked up from his cooking or dishes, and paused for a second. He leaned out of the kitchen and said,

“You know, when you were having your car accident, I was listening to this song.”

It was said in his regular, matter-of-fact voice, and yet what it meant caused a wave to wash over my core. I couldn’t quite wrap my head around what it meant, even though simply hearing the words had such an effect. For a long time I attempted, using the exaggerated tries at reason that occur when I am faced with moments like these, moments I ought, I suppose, to simply let be in their import, the way they change what I remember and what I think about what I cannot recall. I tried to logically piece together the timeline. When did the song begin? Was it playing before or after my mother made the call from the hospital? How could my father possibly have known that the two things occurred at the same exact time? Finally I realized that none of that mattered. Finally the revelation of what this memory meant to my father, and therefore to me, came about. What it meant was this:

Because, at the time of the accident—the time of car hitting car, of bitter Alaskan winter night’s cold, of my body hurled into darkness—the word ‘Hallelujah’ was pronounced in a song, my father had never doubted that I would live. Some might call it out of place: ‘hallelujah’ is a word of rejoicing, what some call the highest word. How could it be joyful, against that scene in the darkness, that scene that might have resulted in my death? But because my father is faithful, and because he remembers what I do not, I believe that the song was a comfort to him, that it was joyful because of what he knew then. I believe that the simple chorus replaces my own lost memories, gives me over to my father’s knowledge that I remained among the living, although I myself was unconscious. I am grateful for having survived, yes, although to what or whom precisely I don’t quite know. I am grateful to others’ memories for filling in my spotty one—my father’s, my mother’s, those memories running in tandem while mine could not.

If the accident were a movie, its soundtrack would be Rufus Wainwright, singing his hallelujahs over the ringing of the telephone. Its visual sequences would play out simultaneously: my father at the computer, turning up the song; my body flung through the cold, clear sky, or strapped to a gurney, speeding to the hospital; my mother picking the phone from its cradle, unsuspecting. What my father remembers: that a single, bright word struck him—‘hallelujah’ from computer speakers. What my mother remembers: mostly that she was terrified, that she went to the hospital alone. That her checklist of fears was real. What I remember: only waking up.

*

The accident was, of course, many years ago, and the injuries have all healed. There remains a scar through my left eyebrow, one that surprises people—most only notice it in the right lighting, or when I’m not wearing make up, and immediately they ask me to recount what happened. I’m getting pretty efficient at detailing everything, but only up to the moment of impact. After that, I rely on what I’ve been told: bits and pieces from Tim and Sarah, some from the doctor who stitched me up, some from my mother. The ordering of events doesn’t always sound the same. I don’t always include the same details or names or descriptions of vehicles; the announcement of it all seems superfluous, the scar itself enough a memory. I cannot describe to anyone that the most vibrant recollection is not a true memory, not that sequence of images dredged up by sight or smell or sound.

I remember the accident most vividly when that Rufus Wainwright song comes on. Sometimes, in need of reassurance or a reminder that I’ve lived, I play it repeatedly, turning the volume up. In place of that hour of unconsciousness, my memory fills up with a vision of my father, sitting as he must have been that night—in front of his computer, reading the daily news online, some awareness woken by the first moments of the song. These are his memories, not mine, and yet I can feel them, the immersive realizations he came to covering up the fear he must have felt. There’s a montage running through my head at moments like these, much like the motion picture I imagine my body’s flight to be, a series of half-lit images that in fact I never saw. I play the song so that I don’t forget what never, in so many respects, actually happened to me, and the blank space in my memory fills up like an empty vessel with something strange and overwhelming. I’m recovering once again, having almost drowned each time in renewed astonishment that I’ve survived. These things I don’t remember play over in my thoughts as the song does through its fuzzy speakers, a voice under water telling me what I’ve come to know—faith, my father, ‘hallelujah’.


Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Why, yes, I am kind of a socialist hippie.

I wrote this eons ago for possibly one of the best classes I've ever taken-with one of the best professors, who shall remain nameless. But, I've been thinking a lot about work, what it really means, and why it's valuable to me to consistently 'work', rather than taking on the attitude that if I didn't have to, I wouldn't...


Throughout Karl Marx’ major works, there is a tone of derisiveness; Marx’ venom is directed towards that class of people which represents capitalism. His sympathies are reserved mainly for the lower—class, and in particular for the working class. Conception of the state of the working class as unacceptable, as objectified, is extremely important to the understanding of Marx and his ideas. To work, as it stands today, has become a detached, even degrading process, by which men are removed from the very natures and desires that inspired them to labor, to create products to begin with.

In order to better understand how it is that men can be completely segregated from his occupation and the fruits of it, we must first understand Marx’ ideas about alienation; how does it come about, and through what avenues might it be avoided? Here, we see that there exists a relationship between workers, and the products that they create and export to the outside world. What makes a relationship such as this possible, when ‘products’, as most would see them, are inanimate, expendable objects? Marx seems to believe that a product is imbued with the essence of its creator; when someone labors to create something, it becomes a part of them. For example, a woodworker who carves a great statue has spent his energies upon it, such that the statue is now dear to his heart; in a way, it now holds a personal attachment for him. Furthermore, it becomes apparent that the very essence of human-ness is removed from us when we begin simply working; labor becomes not a reason to exist, but a means by which we simply survive. Marx is also wholly opposed to the processes by which men become removed from what he calls “the sensuous external world”, meaning that world around us which is completely natural, is nature itself. Another issue of great concern to Marx is that of the appropriation of this external world; he maintains that, when made to labor extensively, we become detached from the true purpose of it. It becomes less an appreciated “means of existence” and more an indirect means of survival. We are no longer connected to that which has sustained our means of work.

What is most repellent to Marx is not this idea of alienation itself, but the final outcome of being thus removed from our once inherent rapport with the world around us. Marx states:

In both respects, therefore, the worker becomes a slave of the object….”

This is illustrated as a rather monotonous cycle, throughout which man receives work itself (a job) and then produces something by which he is able to subsist. Without work itself, and without the product to sell, or to get paid to make, he cannot exist. Marx offers several juxtapositions that illustrate the eventual result of this cycle, which, he says, rotates in accordance with the laws of political economy. The relationship of worker to product/production is presented as a nearly-parasitic coexistence: for example, the more the laborer expends, the less he receives; the more value he creates (the more product), the less valuable he himself becomes. As alienation of worker from product is discussed, so is the alienation of the worker from the means of production; after all, if one becomes removed from an object, it stands to reason that one would also become rather indifferent to the fabrication of that object in the process.

During this sense of what Marx calls “alienation of labor”, the work begins to externalize itself from the laborer. It is no longer in his nature to do the work he is now required to carry out. (Perhaps this can be likened to a desk clerk continuing, day after day, to file papers, all the while knowing that she was born to be on Broadway.) Unable to fulfill any personal hopes or dreams while laboring, the worker must therefore turn to leisure for a feeling of well-being. In some respects this is a valid argument, since most of us can relate to the fervent daydream that five o’clock might roll around sooner, allowing us to adjourn our workplaces and go fishing.

Throughout his discussion of alienation of labor, and of the process of laboring, Marx emphasizes that the products being created are always expended, never taken in; the energy and effort of working are always for the benefit of others, not for the worker himself. Here we discover the true reason for his dislike of alienation in its various forms. Since the products themselves have become alien, and the activity of fabricating them is not only alien, but also forced upon us, it cannot belong to us. If the worker himself is not the recipient of any such benefits, then some other human being must be. Thus, using the comparisons given earlier, such as that of the worker becoming less valuable while his work is more so, the labor/product that has caused so much degradation to the laborer must be doing the opposite for someone else.

Marx uses this demonstration of opposites to illustrate the point that there are two factions of society being created by alienated labor: that of the worker, the oppressed, and that of the man who does not work; he also suggests that there is a relationship between the capitalist, and work. Recall that one of Marx’s greatest nemeses is the concept of capitalism, and there lies the basis for much of his opposition to alienation, which he sees as supporting the capitalist agenda. A large portion of his ire is also reserved for the fact that, using the theories already discussed, the inevitable result of alienation is the emergence of private property. To Marx, whose Communist Manifesto is a treatise of one purpose only, that being the abolition of such private property, this is utterly repugnant. Therefore, in order to further his theories about Communism, Marx must have had to attack that which undermined such ideas, namely the concept of alienated labor.